Environmental Risk and Impact Assessment of Inter-Basin Water Transfer (IBWT): A PRISMA-Based Systematic

Document Type : Review Article

Authors

1 PhD Student in Environmental Engineering and Science, Department of Environmental Planning and Design, Environmental Sciences Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Environmental Planning and Design, Environmental Sciences Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

10.22059/jhsci.2026.412856.931

Abstract

Objective: This research aims to systematically analyze the environmental, social, and economic risks and consequences arising from Inter-Basin Water Transfer (IBWT). Its novelty lies in presenting the first PRISMA-based systematic review that simultaneously covers three dimensions: hazards, evaluation criteria, and compensatory measures on a global scale. Despite the widespread use of these projects to compensate for water scarcity, concerns about ecological risks and disruption of basin functions highlight the necessity of this study.
Method: This is a PRISMA-based systematic review, searching reputable databases (Scopus, WoS, ScienceDirect, etc.) from 1980 to 2024. Inclusion criteria: peer-reviewed studies related to IBWT. Exclusion criteria: purely engineering studies and informal reports. From 1,478 initial studies, after screening, 84 credible sources were analyzed.
Results: In developing countries, rapid urban and industrial growth is the main driver of IBWT, while in developed countries, climatic stress is the primary driver. The novel output of this study has three axes: (1) a coherent classification of IBWT consequences in source, destination, and transfer routes (for the first time in a systematic review); (2) the integration of seven axes of mitigation strategies into an operational framework; and (3) identification of the structural weakness of evaluation criteria (lack of precise and enforceable guidelines). In addition to benefits such as ecosystem restoration, land subsidence reduction, and water security enhancement, IBWT is associated with negative consequences including reduced environmental flow, soil salinization, transfer of pollution and diseases, widespread animal mortality, and environmental disasters. The integrated framework presented in this study can serve as a basis for future evaluations and sustainable IBWT policymaking.
Conclusions:Sustainable implementation of IBWT requires risk assessment, transparent governance, compensation for damages, and long-term monitoring. Due to the diverse geographical coverage of the sources (America, Europe, Asia, Africa, Australia), the integrated framework of this study is generalizable to other regions, but its application requires adaptation to local conditions. "Transparent governance and compensation for damages" are more important in developing countries, while "long-term monitoring and risk assessment" are more important in developed countries.

Keywords


Berkes, F., & Folke, C. (1998), Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience. In:Transferred to digital printing. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ.
Chen. D., Luo. Z., & Webber. M. (2020), Between project and region: the challenges of managing water in shandong province after the south-north water transfer project. Water Alternatives, 13(1): 21.
Cheng, H., Hu, Y., & Zhao, J. (2009). Meeting China’s Water Shortage Crisis: Current Practices and Challenges. Environ. Sci. Tech. 43 (2), 240–244. https://doi.org/10.1021/es801934a.
Colding, J. & Barthel, S. (2019), Exploring the social-ecological systems discourse 20 years later. Ecology and Society, 24(1): art2. DOI: 10.5751/ES-10598-240102
Cumming, GS., Epstein, G., & Anderies, JM. (2020), Advancing understanding of natural resource governance: a post-Ostrom research agenda. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 44: 26–34. DOI: 10. 1016/j.cosust.2020.02.005.
Das, DK. (2006), Environmental impact of inter-basin transfer projects: some evidence from Canada. Political Weekly 41(17): 1703–1707
Davies. BR., Thoms. M., & Meador. M. (2021), An assessment of the ecological impacts of inter-basin watertransfers, and their threats to river basin integrity and conservation. Aquatic Conservation: Marine andFreshwater Ecosystems 2(4): 325–349. DOI: 10.1002/aqc.3270020404
Dong, Z., Yan, Y., & Duan, J. (2011), Computing payment forecosystem services in watersheds: an analysis of themiddle route project of south-to-north water diversionin China. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 23(12):2005–2012. DOI: 10.1016/S1001-0742(10)60663-8.
Duan, K., Caldwell, P.V., Sun, G., McNulty, S.G., Qin, Y. & Chen, X. (2022). Climatechange challenges efficiency of inter-basin water transfers in alleviating water stress. Environ. Res. Lett. 17(4) https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac5e68.
Gao, T., Liu, H., Sun, Y., & Zhang, E. (2021), Sustaining environmental flows in waterdeficient rivers via inter-basin hydropower transfer. Hydrol. Process. 35‌(2), e14027. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14027
Gupta, J., & van der Zaag, P. (2008), Interbasin watertransfers and integrated water resources management: Where engineering, science and politics interlock. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth. 33(1–2): 28–40. DOI: 10.1016/j.pce.2007.04.003
Hagemann, N., & Kirschke, S. (2017) Key Issues of Interdisciplinary NEXUS Governance Analyses: Lessons Learned from Research on Integrated .WaterResources Management. Resources. 6(1): 9. DOI: 10.3390/resources6010009
Jia, X., Klemeˇs, J., Varbanov, P., & Wan Alwi, S. (2019), Analyzing the energy consumption, GHG emission, and cost of seawater desalination in China. Energies, 12‌(3), 463. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12030463.
Jiao, L., Liu, R., Wang, L., Li, L., & Cao, L. (2021), Evaluating spatiotemporal variations inthe impact of inter-basin water transfer projects in water-receiving basin. WaterResour. Manag. 35‌(15), 5409–5429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-021-03011-1.
Kanrak, M., & Nguyen, H.-O. (2025), An analysis of connectivity, assortativity and cluster structure of the Asian-Australasian cruise shipping network. Marit. Transport Res. 3, 100048 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.martra.2021.100048
Kattel, G.R., Shang, W., Wang, Z., & Langford, J. (2019), China’s south-to-north waterdiversion project empowers sustainable water resources system in the north. Sustainability, 11‌(13), 3735. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133735.
Kibiiy, J., & Ndambuki, J. (2015), New criteria to assess interbasin water transfers and a case for Nzoia-Suam/Turkwel in Kenya. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 89–90: 121–126. DOI: 10.1016/j.pce.2015.08.005
Liu, J. & Yang, W. (2012), Water sustainability for China and beyond. Science, 337‌(6095), 649–650. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1219471
Liu, Y., Zheng, H., Wan, W., & Zhao, J. (2023). Optimal operation toward energy efficiency of the long-distance water transfer project. J. Hydrol. 618, 129152 https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129152.
 Marques, A.C., Veras, C.E., & Rodriguez, D.A. (2022), Assessment of water policiescontributions for sustainable water resources management under climate change scenarios. J. Hydrol. (Amst.) 608, 127690. https://doi.org/10.1016/J. JHYDROL.2022.127690
Nong, S. & Xiao, Z. (2019), Spatio-temporal characterization analysis and water quality assessment of the south-to-north water diversion project of China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 16‌(12), 2227. https://doi.org/10.3390/ ijerph16122227
Paiva, A. C. d. E., Martins, M., Canamary, E. A., Rodriguez, D. A., & Tomasella, J. (2024). Inter‑basin water transfers under changing climate and land use: Assessing water security and hydropower in the Paraíba do Sul River basin, Brazil. Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 133, 104707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2023.104707
Pasi, N. (2023), Rethinking Water Resources Management,Governance, and Decision-Making: A Case Study of Interlinking of Rivers Project, India. New York: State University of New York, Syracuse
Pohlner, H. (2016), Institutional change and the political economy of water megaprojects: China’s south-northwater transfer. Global Environmental Change, 38:205–216. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.03.015. Elsevier Ltd
Rahaman, MM., & Varis, O. (2005), Integrated water resources management: evolution, prospects and future challenges. Sustainability: Science, Practiceand Policy, 1(1): 15–21. DOI: 10.1080/15487733. 2005.11907961
Reed, PM., & Kasprzyk, J. (2009), Water resources management: the myth, the wicked, and the future. Journalof Water Resources Planning and Management, 135(6): 411–413. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000047
Rollason, E., Sinha, P., & Bracken, L.J. (2022), Interbasin water transfer in a changing world: A new conceptual model, Progress in Physical Geography, 46(3) 371–397, DOI: 10.1177/03091333211065004.
Sheng, J., & Qiu, W. (2023), Inter-basin water transfer policies and water-use technical efficiency: China’s South-North Water Transfer Project. Socioecon. Plann. Sci. 85, 101432 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2022.101432.
Shumilova, O., Tockner, K., & Thieme, M. (2018), Global water transfer megaprojects: a potential solution forthe water-food-energy nexus? Frontiers in Environmental Science. 6: 1–11. DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2018. 00150
Song, D. I., Zhang, C., & Saber, A. (2024), Integrating impacts of climate change on aquatic environments in inter‑basin water regulation: Establishing a critical threshold for best management practices. Science of the Total Environment, 913, 169297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169297
Wang, Y. Zhu, K. Xiong, X. Yin, J. Yan, H. & Zhang, Y. Liu, (2023), H.Assessment of the EcologicalCompensation Standards for Cross-Basin Water Diversion Projects from the Perspective of Main Headwater and Receiver Areas. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 20, 717. https://doi.org/10.3390/ ijerph20010717
Wang, J., Hou, B., Zhao, Y., Xiao, W., & Lu, F. (2021), Research on scale demonstration technology of inter basin water transfer project in agricultural irrigation. Water Resour. Manag. 35‌(15), 5243–5258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-021-02999-w
Xiong, W., Li, Y., Zhang, W., Ye, Q., Zhang, S., & Hou, X. (2018), Integrated multi-objectiveoptimization framework for urban water supply systems under alternative climates and future policy. J. Clean. Prod. 195, 640–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2018.05.161.
Yang, Y., Chen, S., Zhou, Y., Ma, G., Huang, W., & Zhu, Y. (2023), Method for quantitatively assessing the impact of an inter‑basin water transfer project on ecological environment‑power generation in a water supply region. Journal of Hydrology, 618, 129250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129250
Yi, S., & Kondolf, G. M. (2024), Environmental planning and the evolution of inter-basin water transfers in the United States. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 12, 1489917.
Zhao, C., Kong, L., Zhong, C., & Ying, N. (2025). Equality in the water: How does water ecological civilization city policy enhance inclusive development in China? Cities, 156, 105555.
Zhuang, W. )2016(, Eco-environmental impact of inter-basin water transfer projects: A review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 23‌(13), 12867–12879. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11356-016-6854-3