Explaining the Relationship between Demographic Characteristics and Risk Perception (RP) to Reduce the Fire Hazards (Case Study: Office High-rise Buildings in Tehran)

Document Type : Applied Article

Authors

1 Department of Architecture, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran

2 Department of Urban planning, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
One of the most important points in designing high-rise buildings is considering the issue of evacuating individuals at hazards. The evacuation of individuals is related to their safety and has direct connection with demographic characteristics (Gender, Age, Noticing fire incident, Familiarity with Exit Signs). The present study has been conducted with the main purpose of achieving functional patterns of demographic characteristics in relation to Risk Perception by the individual trapped in fire in high rise office buildings, in order to reduce the hazards of fire and the increase of individual safety.
Methods
The method of study is of mixed-methods type, and the coefficient of determination (R2) has been achieved through the analysis SPSS 22 software via independent sample t-test and ANOVA. The scope of the study consists of eight high-rise office buildings, which are exposed to fire during the years 2011-2016 in Tehran, which consists of a population equal to 245 individuals either trapped in the fire or attempted evacuation.
Discussions and Results
The results show that the demographic characteristics in relation to Risk Perception by the individuals trapped in fire has the p-value [sig ≤ 0.05] and are predictable.
Conclusion
Finally the study presents that women, age 20-30 years, and individuals who are exactly familiar with exit signs, have the most relation to the Risk Perception. Also, in the fire floor and the whole building, the most relation to the Risk Perception belongs to individuals whose corridor noise has informed them of the fire. Educating individuals and recognizing exit signs, such as signage and siren sound, to residents of high-rise buildings can increase the Risk Perception and safety, thereby reducing the fire hazards. 

Keywords

References

1[. دفتر تدوین مقررات ملی (1395). مبحث سوم حفاظت ساختمان‌ها در مقابل حریق. چ دوم، تهران: مرکز تحقیقات راه، مسکن، شهرسازی.
]2[. رجب‌زاده، علیرضا (‌1394). «چرا دانش مخاطرات؟ (تبیین حقوق و مخاطرات)»، مدیریت مخاطرات محیطی.دورۀ 2،ش1، ص 4-1.
]3[. مقیمی، ابراهیم (1394). دانش مخاطرات (برای زندگی با کیفیت بهتر). چ دوم، تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
]4[. ----------- (1395). «چرا دانش مخاطرات (دیدگاهی جدید برای درک مخاطرات)؟»، دورۀ 3، ش 3، ص 197-191.
‌]5[. ----------- (1393). «چرا دانش مخاطرات؟ (1) (تعریف و ضرورت)»، دورۀ 1، ش 1، ص 3-1.
[6]. Almejmaj, M; Meacham, B; & Skorinko, J. (2015). “The effects of cultural differences between the west and Saudi Arabia on emergency evacuation—clothing effects on walking speed”. Fire and Materials, 1099-1018, 39(4), pp.353-370, doi:10.1002/fam.2227.
[7].Bryant, P; & Giachritsis, C. (2014). “The GETAWAY Project–Improving Passenger Evacuation Techniques in Railway Stations (and Other Transport Hubs)”, Traffic Safety, 1119307856, pp.347-365, doi:10.1002/9781119307853.ch22.
[8].Galea, E; Xie, H., Deere, S; Cooney, D; & Filippidis, L. (2017). “An international survey and full‐scale evacuation trial demonstrating the effectiveness of the active dynamic signage system concept”, Fire and Materials, 1099-1018, 41(5), pp.493-513, doi:10.1002/fam.2414.
[9].Galea, E. R;; Xie, H; & Lawrence, P. J. (2014). “Experimental and survey studies on the effectiveness of dynamic signage systems”, Fire Safety Science, 1817-4299, 11, pp.1129-1143, doi:10.3801/IAFSS.FSS.11-1129.
[10].Gorbil, G; & Gelenbe, E. (2013). “Disruption tolerant communications for large scale emergency evacuation”, Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops), 146735077X, pp.540-546, doi:10.1109/PerComW.2013.6529555.
[11].Gotham, K. F; Campanella, R; Lauve‐Moon, K; & Powers, B. (2018). “Hazard experience, geophysical vulnerability, and flood risk perceptions in a postdisaster city, the case of New Orleans”, Risk Analysis,1539-6924,38(2), pp.345-356, doi:10.1111/risa.12830.
[12].Hackman, C. L; & Knowlden, A. P. (2014). “Theory of reasoned action and theory of planned behavior-based dietary interventions in adolescents and young adults: a systematic review”, Adolescent health, medicine and therapeutics, 1179-318X, 5, pp.101-114, doi:10.2147/AHMT.S56207.
[13].Heath, R. L; Lee, J; Palenchar, M. J., & Lemon, L. L. (2017). “Risk communication emergency response preparedness: contextual assessment of the protective action decision model”, Risk Analysis, 1539-6924,38(2), pp. 333–344, doi:10.1111/risa.12845.
[14].Kinateder, M. T; Kuligowski, E. D; Reneke, P. A; & Peacock, R. D. (2014). “A review of risk perception in building fire evacuation”, National Institute of Standards and Technology,1840, pp.1-42,doi:10.6028/NIST.TN.1840.
[15].Kinateder, M. T; Kuligowski, E. D; Reneke, P. A; & Peacock, R. D. (2015). Risk perception in fire evacuation behavior revisited: definitions, related concepts, and empirical evidence. Fire science reviews, 2193-0414, 4(1), pp. 1-26, doi:10.1186/s40038-014-0005-z.
[16].Kinateder, M. T; Omori, H; & Kuligowski, E. D. (2014). “The use of elevators for evacuation in fire emergencies in international buildings”, US Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 1825, pp.1-25, doi:10.6028/NIST.TN.1825.
[17].Kuligowski, E. (2013). “Predicting human behavior during fires”, Fire Technology, 0015-2684, 49(1),pp.101-120, doi:10.1007/s10694-011-0245-6.
[18].Kuligowski, E. D. (2016). “Human behavior in fire”, SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering , 978-1-4939-2565-0,pp.2070-2114, doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-2565-0_58.
[19].McLaughlin, A. C; & Mayhorn, C. B. (2014). “Designing effective risk communications for older adults”, Safety science, 0925-7535,61, pp.59-65, doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2012.05.002.
[20].Morales, A; Alcarria, R; Martin, D; & Robles, T. (2014).” Enhancing evacuation plans with a situation awareness system based on end-user knowledge provision”, Sensors, 14(6), pp.11153-11178, doi:10.3390/s140611153.
[21].Niemela, P; & Kim, S. (2014). “Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs”, Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research, 9400707525, pp.3843-3846, doi:10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_1737.
[22].Norazahar, N; Khan, F; Veitch, B; & MacKinnon, S. (2014). “Human and organizational factors assessment of the evacuation operation of BP Deepwater Horizon accident”, Safety science, 0925-7535, 70,pp.41-49, doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2014.05.002.
[23].Notebaert, L; Masschelein, S; Wright, B., & MacLeod, C. (2016). “To risk or not to risk: Anxiety and the calibration between risk perception and danger mitigation”, Journal of experimental psychology: learning, memory, and cognition, 1939-1285, 42(6), 985, doi:10.1037/xlm0000210.
[24].Olander, J; Ronchi, E; Lovreglio, R; & Nilsson, D. (2017). “Dissuasive exit signage for building fire evacuation”, Applied ergonomics, 0003-6870, 59, pp.84-93,doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2016.08.029.
[25].Onorati, T; Malizia, A; Díaz, P; & Aedo, I. (2014). “Modeling an ontology on accessible evacuation routes for emergencies”, Expert Systems with Applications,0957-4174,41(16),7124-134,doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2014.05.039.
[26].Ronchi, E; Fridolf, K; Frantzich, H; Nilsson, D; Walter, A. L; & Modig, H. (2017). “A tunnel evacuation experiment on movement speed and exit choice in smoke”, Fire Safety Journal. 0379-7112,pp.1-11, doi:10.1016/j.firesaf.2017.06.002.
[27].Ronchi, E; & Nilsson, D. (2013). “Fire evacuation in high-rise buildings: a review of human behaviour and modelling research”, Fire science reviews, 2193-0414, 2(1), pp.1-21, doi:10.1186/2193-0414-2-7.
[28].Ronchi, E; & Nilsson, D. (2015). “A Virtual Reality experiment on the design of flashing lights at emergency exit portals for road tunnel evacuations”, Department of Fire Safety Engineering,Lund University, 1572-8099,3180,pp.1-31, doi:10.1007/s10694-015-0462-5.
[29].Rother, F. C; Rebello, W. F; Healy, M. J; Silva, M. M; Cabral, P. A; Vital, H. C; & Andrade, E. R. (2016). “Radiological Risk Assessment by convergence methodology model in RDD scenarios”, Risk Analysis, 1539-6924, 36(11), pp.2039-2046. doi:10.1111/risa.12557.
[30].Ryu, Y; & Kim, S. (2015). “Testing the heuristic/systematic information-processing model (HSM) on the perception of risk after the Fukushima nuclear accidents”, Journal of Risk Research, 1366-9877, 18(7),pp.840-859,doi:1013669877/2014/910694/1080.
[31].Tancogne-Dejean, M; & Laclémence, P. (2016). “Fire risk perception and building evacuation by vulnerable persons: points of view of laypersons, fire victims and experts”, Fire Safety Journal,0379-7112, pp.80,9-19, doi:10.1016/j.firesaf.201511/009.
[32].Trumbo, C; Meyer, M. A; Marlatt, H; Peek, L; & Morrissey, B. (2014). “An assessment of change in risk perception and optimistic bias for hurricanes among Gulf Coast residents”, Risk Analysis, 1539-6924, 34(6), pp.1013-1024, doi:10.1111/risa.12149.
[33].Urata, J; & Pel, A. J. (2017). “People's risk recognition preceding evacuation and its role in demand modeling and planning”, Risk Analysis, 1539-6924, pp.1-17, doi:10.1111/risa.12931.
[34].Wachinger, G; Renn, O; Begg, C; & Kuhlicke, C. (2013). “The risk perception paradox—implications for governance and communication of natural hazards”, Risk Analysis, 1539-6924, 33(6), pp.1049-1065, doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01942.
[35].Wilson, F; Gott, M; & Ingleton, C. (2013). “Perceived risks around choice and decision making at end-of-life: a literature review”, Palliative medicine, 0269-2163, 27(1), pp.38-53, doi:10.1177/0269216311424632.
Environmental Management Hazards
Volume 5, Issue 1
April 2018
Pages 1-15

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics