Criminal Policy based on Hazards Science "A Case Study of the Floods of 2019 in Khuzestan and Shiraz"

Introduction
The purpose of this study is to analyze the pathology of criminal policy based on the Hazards Science to the pathology of the common areas of this science with criminal law. Hazards Science of securing health against potentially dangerous events has become increasingly important in criminal sciences in general and criminal policy in particular. Lawmakers seek to address possible threats posed by some crimes as comprehensive laws for future generations and events. In this regard, the legislator seeks to delineate, with offenses and penalties, directions to reduce the potential costs of environmental offenses to individuals, and communities.
On this basis, if the concern of risk, namely the preservation and promotion of environmental and human health and the effort to take care of prenatal care, enters into the field of criminal policy, maximum protection for humans and the environment can be achieved. Recently, floods that according to experts, have been facilitated by human factors and weak regulatory measures, have increasingly demonstrated the weakness of penal regulations and criminal policy. However, based on considerations of Hazards Science, to what extent and in what dimensions can this science be considered as the underlying cause of the floods and the criminal responses appropriate to these behaviors?
The method of this study is a library with a descriptive-analytical tool while studying various sources, giving practical examples, especially in the field of recent floods in Khuzestan and Shiraz. Finally, as a result of the pathology of penal policy based on risk knowledge considerations, this discussion has the potential to arise in various aspects of criminal law, from criminalization of risky behaviors to responding to such behaviors as well as outlining the appropriate structure. In terms of science, Hazard is a strategic priority. Previous studies have shown that floods, behaviors, and failures by competent authorities play a key role in changing the environment and lack of proper decision-making have been recognized in non-criminal regulations, and acceptable responses.
Therefore, in order to a criminal policy be efficient, fair and humane at the same time, it is necessary to use different types and amounts of penalties in predicting and enforcing criminal offenses commensurate with the variety of offenses affecting the flood, the variety of offenders, and the different conditions of the offense. Consider the core of superior criminal policy, which is to bring justice to society. Another consequence is that criminal responses should be predicted as compensatory damages to victims affected by the flood. In addition, given the subjective concern of Hazards Science in the areas of quality improvement and mitigation of potential threats to humans and the environment in the form of floods, the scientific approach to hazards and its classifications can attract experts in the field of criminal policy to develop effective systematic penal laws and strengthen their preventive practices.