Capabilities of Social Media for Crowdsourcing of Earthquake Hazards Management

Document Type : Applied Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, IRIB University

2 Media Management, Allameh Tabatabei University

Abstract

The aim of this research was to study the capabilities of social media for crowdsourcing of earthquake hazards management. The capabilities were identified in the three stages of pre-earthquake stage, acute-earthquake stage (the first 24 hours), and post-earthquake stage. The research method was Delphi. The study populations were managers and experts in the field of crisis and social media, which 22 people from this community were chosen as sample. In the first phase of Delphi, interviews were conducted with experts. Then the interviews were analyzed and coded. In the second phase, a questionnaire based on the findings of the first phase was sent to the experts and their responses were analyzed. The process was repeated in the third and fourth phases. The experts reached a consensus on some of the capabilities of social media, which is characterized as follows: Pre-earthquake stage (“Seeking ideas and opinions”, “Warning”, “Rescue”, “Monitoring the performance of managers” and “Training before the crisis”), Acute-earthquake stage (“Warning”, “Rescue”, “Documentation”, “Public Participation stuff” and “Monitoring the performance of managers”), and Post-earthquake stage (“Rescue”, “Monitoring the performance of managers”, “Public Participation stuff”, “Crisis map”, “Estimated damage”, “Shortages announcement”, “The identification of the original inhabitants of the earthquake area”, “Collecting information on the dead, missing, wounded, etc”).

Keywords


  1. افضلی، محدثه (1391). نقش و کارکرد شبکههای اجتماعی مجازی در مدیریت بحران. تهران.
  2. الهی ناطقی، فریبرز (1378). مدیریت بحران زمین‌لرزه در ایران. تهران: پژوهشگاه بین‌المللی زلزله‌شناسی و مهندسی زلزله.
  3. تاجیک، محمدرضا (1379). مدیریت بحران: نقدی بر شیوههای تحلیل و تدبیر بحران در ایران. تهران: نشر فرهنگ گفتمان.
  4. سوری، علی (1394). قابلیت‌های رسانه‌های اجتماعی بومی در جمع‌سپاری مدیریت بلایای طبیعی (زلزله). تهران: دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی.
  5. عبداللهی، مجید (1394). مدیریت بحران در نواحی شهری. چ پنجم. تهران: انتشارات سازمان شهرداری‌ها و دهیاری‌های کشور.
  6. مقیمی، ابراهیم (1393). دانش مخاطرات برای زندگی با کیفیت بهتر و محیط پایدارتر، تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
  7. مهربان، فاطمه (1393). مدیریت بحران زلزلۀ احتمالی شهر تهران به کمک رسانه‌های اجتماعی. تهران: دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی.
  8. نصرتی، صدیقه؛ توزنده جانی، حسین (1385). «بهداشت و درمان در حوادث و سوانح غیرمترقبه». همایش سراسری راهکارهای ارتقای مدیریت بحران در حوادث و سوانح غیرمترقبه.
  9. نیک کارتر، دبلیو (1371). مدیریت سوانح و حوادث غیرمترقبه. تهران: انتشارات مرکز مطالعات و پژوهش‌های ارتش بیست میلیونی.
    1. Barrington, L., Ghosh, S., Greene, M., Har-Noy, S., Berger, J., Gill, S., . . . Huyck, C. (2012). “Crowdsourcing earthquake damage assessment using remote sensing imagery”. Annals of Geophysics, 54(6).
    2. Burnett, J. (1998). “A Strategic Approach to Managing Crisis”. Public Relation Review, 4(24), 475-485.
    3. Capilanou. (2010). Retrieved from www.capilanou.ca/help/login-page/active-cms/glossary.html
    4. Castells, M. (2007). “Communication, power and counter-power in the network society”. International journal of communication , 1 (1), 235.
    5. DMTP. (1998). Model for national Disaster Management Structure, Preparedness plan, and Supportig egislation. FAO.UN.Disaster Mangement Training Program (DMTP).
    6. Feighery, A. (2014). Crowdsourcing for natural disaster response: An evaluation of crisis mapping the 2010 Haitian earthquake.
    7. Heinzelman, J.; Waters, C. (2010). Crowdsourcing crisis information in disaster-affected Haiti. Washington, DC: US Institute of Peace.
    8. Hörler, R. (2014, August 25). “Crowdsourcing In The Humanitarian Network – An Analysis Of The Literature”. Department of environmental science (D-USYS) ETH Zurich. Zurich.
    9. Howe, J. (2006, June 2). Crowdsourcing: A definition. Retrieved May 30, 2014, from crowdsourcing.typepad.com
    10. Initiative Harvard Humanitarian. (2011). Disaster Relief 2.0: The Future of Information Sharing in Humanitarian Emergencies. UN Foundation & Vodafone Foundation Technology Partnership, Washington, D.C. and Berkshire, UK.
    11. Kaplan, A. M. (2010). “Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media”. Business horizons , 53 (1), 59-68.
    12. Majchrzak, A.; Malhotra, A. (2013). “Towards an information systems perspective and research agenda on crowdsourcing for innovation”. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 22(4), 257—268.
    13. McConkey, D. (1986). “Planning for Uncertainty”. Business Horizons Journal, 30.
    14. Patrick, M. (2011). “New information technologies and their impact on the humanitarian sector”. International review of the Red Cross, 93(884), 1239-1263.
    15. Shipley. (2012). Coining the term social media. Retrieved Jan 25, 2013, from Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Shipley.
    16. Surowiecki, J. (2005). The wisdom of crowds. New York: Anchor.
    17. Teraguchi, M.; Saito, S.; Lau, T.; Ohno, M.; Cerruti, J. A.; Takagi, H. (2012). “Crowdsourcing in Crisis Informatics for Disaster Relief”. Proceedings of the Computer-Supported Cooperative Workshop on Collaboration and Crisis Informatics , pp. 61-66.
    18. Theobald, C. (2013, July 29). Retrieved July 17, 2014, from University of Central Lancashire (uclan): http://www.uclan.ac.uk
    19. The Web 2.0 Glossary : R-Z. (2011). Retrieved Apr. 22, 2011, from Http://www.webtrends.about.com/od/web20/a/web20-glossary_2.htm
    20. UNISDR. (2006). United Nations International strategy for disaster reduction. Retrieved from http://www.unisdr.org
    21. World Bank. (1989). Adult Health in Brazil: Adjusting to New Challenges. World Bank Publication.