Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis and Strong Ground Motion Assessment in Southwest Alborz, Iran

Document Type : Applied Article

Authors

1 Department of Geophysics, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Engineering Seismology, International Institute of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering. Department of Geophysics, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

3 Department of Mining Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Tehran University. Department of Geophysics, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

10.22059/jhsci.2023.353115.760

Abstract

Introduction  
A significance of seismic studies is that the correct seismic analysis of any type (seismic hazard analysis, seismic risk analysis, ground seismic response analysis, seismic site effects, and structural dynamic analysis) can offer useful economic parameters and avoid conservative design and implementation, which lead to an irrational increase in project costs and poor implementation, which in turn causes increased risk and possibility of destruction. According to the seismotectonic map of Iran (Berberian, 1976), earthquakes in Alborz are shallow. There are also some intermediate earthquakes, and overall, the eastern Alborz is more earthquake prone than the western Alborz [1].
Materials and Methods
The maximum magnitude (Mmax) is usually estimated based on the general characteristics of seismic activity and geological similarities. In applied studies, Mmax is often estimated based on correlation of seismic magnitude and different fault parameters such as rupture, fracture surface area, maximum surface displacement, and seismic moment release rate. Multiple correlations have been proposed to relate these parameters and the earthquakes magnitude. (Table 1) shows some correlations by different scholars. Correlations in (Table 1) were used to calculate the maximum empirical magnitude [3].
Table 1. Correlations between the earthquake magnitude and different fault parameters




Correlation


Proposed by


No.




Ms=5.4+LogLR


Mohajer and Nowroozi (1978)


1




Mw=3.66+0.91LnLR


Zare (1995)


2




Ms: Surface wave magnitude                                                          Lf: Fault length (km)
Mw: Moment magnitude                                                                  LR: Rupture length (km)




 
Seismicity Parameter Estimation
The K-S method was used to achieve seismicity parameters within the scope of this study [2].
Discussion and Results
The results of probabilistic seismic hazard analysis were calculated using attenuation relationships Zare 1999 [4], Ambraseys 1995, Boore, Joyner and Fumal 1981in studying region. These results are presented in (Table 2) and (Table 3).
Table 2. strong vertical ground motion




Return period


H.PGA(g)




475


0.25




2475


0.44




Table 3. strong Horizontal ground motion




Return period


H.PGA(g)




475


0.42




2475


0.70




 
Conclusion
The recent Malard Earthquake with a magnitude of 5.2 on the Richter scale and multiple earthquakes with magnitudes above 4 have increased the importance of seismic studies in the region. Seismic hazard studies are among the key preliminary urban development studies for preventing seismic vulnerability. The identification of seismic source zones is closely related to development infrastructure in any region. The results of these studies are widely used in vital projects such as water, gas, oil transmission lines, dam and airport construction, and residential development, and overlooking them may cause great damages. The earthquake hazard analysis based on the accurate location of seismic zones will provide more reliable results. The investigation of the region under study, its history of seismicity, and the recent earthquakes indicate the existence of seismic activity in the region. Considering the shallow depth of earthquakes, the intensity of earthquakes occurred in the region is high. Moreover, the calculation of β and λ parameters (ranging from 6.2 to 7.6) shows the seismicity of the region, indicating the need for observing safety measures in the constructions in the region. As mentioned earlier, the recent seismic activities and earthquakes in the region have doubled the importance of seismic studies and measures for strengthening seismic stations in the region. Moreover, the review of seismic catalogs show that the study area has been inactive over the past few decades and hence its sudden activity is quite significant. Also according to the calculations, Alborz Province is located in highly active seismic zone.

Keywords

References

بربریان، مانوئل؛ قریشی، منوچهر؛ طالبیان، مرتضی؛ و شجاع طاهری، جعفر (1375). پژوهش و بررسی نوزمین‌ساخت و خطر زمین‌لرزۀ گسلش در گسترۀ سمنان. سازمان زمین‌شناسی کشور.
درویش‌زاده، علی (1370). زمین‌شناسی ایران. تهران. نشر دانش امروز.
زارع، مهدی (1374). رابطه‌های مناسب بزرگا، شدت و بیشینۀ شتاب افقی براساس زمین‌لرزه‌های ایران. پژوهشنامۀ مؤسسۀ بین‌المللی زلزله‌شناسی و مهندسی زلزله.
زارع، مهدی (1382). مقدمه‌ای بر زلزله‌شناسی کاربردی. پژوهشگاه بین‌المللی زلزله‌شناسی و مهندسی زلزله.
نبوی، محمدحسن (1355). دیباچه‌ای بر زمین‌شناسی ایران. سازمان زمین‌شناسی ایران.
Alavi, M. (1991). Tectonic map of the middle east, Geological Survey of Iran.
Ambraseys, N. N., & Mellville, C. P. (1982) A History of Persian Earthquakes, Camb. Earth Sci. Ser.
Ambraseys, N.N. (1995). The prediction of earthquake peak ground motion acceleration in Europe. Earthquake Engineering and structural Dynamic, 24(c).
Berberian, M. (1976). Contribution to the Seismotectonics of Iran, Geol. Sur. Iran (1976).
Jackson, J. & Mckenzie, D. (1984). Active tectonics of the Alpian‌–‌ Himalayan Belt between western Turkey and Pakistan, Geophysics .J.R .Soc . 77 , (1984).
Joyner, W.B. & Boore, D.M. (1981). Peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from strong-motion records including records from the 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquake, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.
Kijko, A. & Sellevoll, M.A. (1992) Estimation of earthquake hazard parameters from incomplete data files. Part II, Incorporation of magnitude heterogeneity, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 82,120-134.
Maggi, A. A. (2000). re-assessment of focal depth distribution in southern Iran, the Tien shan and northern India: of earthquakes really occur in the continental mantle Geophys.
Maggi, A. (2002). Focal Depths of Moderate and Large Size Earthquakes in Iran, JSEE, 4(2&3).
Nowroozi, A.A. & Mohajer-Ashjai, A. (1985). Fault movements and tectonics of Eastern Iran:boundaries of the Lut plate. Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc.,83.
Priestley, K., Baker, C., & Jackson, J. (1994). Implications of earthquake focal mechanism data for the active tectonics of the south Caspian basin and surrounding regions: Geophysical Journal International, 118.
Zare, M. (1999). Conribution a letude des mouvements forts en Iran: du Catalogue aux  lois dattenuation, These de Doctorat (PhD Thesis), Universite Joseph Fourier,   Gemoble, France.
Zare, M. (2004). Strong motion data of the 1994-2002 earthquakes in Iran: a catalogue of 100 selected records with higher qualities in the low frequencies, Journal of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering 6(2), 1-17.
Environmental Management Hazards
Volume 9, Issue 4
January 2023
Pages 311-323

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics